Sun
Oct
21
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/07/jobs/07pre.html?_r=1&ex=1192680000&en=42d88a4193b3c3b5&ei=5070&emc=eta1&oref=slogin
This New York Times article highly relates to media literacy because it deals directly with messages being sent through e-mail and indirectly with the words we read on the web. Something I found particularly interesting in this article was when it explained how we view a positive e-mail message more neutrally and neutral messages as more negative than what the person originally sending the e-mail intended. There are definitely advantages and disadvantages when it comes to reading words on the Internet, whether one’s reading an e-mail or blog. Serious blunders, misunderstandings, and hurt feelings could possibly occur. However, I feel that this efficient and quick technology is well worth the risks. Perhaps people should become more aware of ways to communicate more precisely.
Wed
Oct
17
In the scene I have chosen from Rear Window, Mr. Jeffries is trying to make sense of the salesman’s actions. Mr. Jeffries’ evidence that possibly indicates that the salesman has murdered his wife are that he no longer hears her nagging, he no longer sees her there, the salesman mysteriously leaves during in the middle the night, the salesman ships away a trunk, and he sees the salesman washing knives and a saw. Based on this evidence, he makes sense that the salesman has killed his wife, for example, he could have used those sharp objects to slay her. Being a man, he might assume this because he knows how aggressive men can behave towards women they despise. Though in a wheeled-chair, Mr. Jeffries is a more dominant character, so maybe this is his way of him making adequate use of himself since he cannot be successful at being a photographer temporarily.
In this scene (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H14Bq4YF40Q) from CSI, a man is being questioned about murdering his wife. The main character tries to makes sense of the circumstance through the evidence. The dead woman was found laying 5 ft. away from the suspect, the suspect tried to dispose of her body, and the suspect claims it was an accident even though he did not call the police right away. At that moment, the questioner most likely believed he murdered her. However, this changes when the suspect further tries to justify himself when he speaks of the odd accidental deaths of his grandmother and neighbor along with accidentally running over his daughter. With this new information in the light, the questioner becomes uncertain. Could this trend mean that his wife’s demise was also an accident? The questioner is rather dominant, determined to prove this man wrong but it backfires on him by the odd responses he receives due to his prying. Due to his status, he appears to assume the suspect was the murderer in the beginning. Due to the questioner’s gender, he appears to want the facts and none of this other baloney about the accidental deaths, for they should not be used to cover up a possible murder.